Search
Random Quotation
In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's the exact opposite.
In H. Eves, Mathematical Circles Adieu, Boston: Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, 1977
Loci: Convergence
show printer friendly
send to a friend
What is 0^0?
Examples
In 1970, Herbert Vaughan [10] argued for the explicit recognition of evaluating 00 = 1. He aimed to show "that there is a good deal of motivation for defining '00' to be a numeral for 1." He provided three examples.
Example 1. Vaughan gave the infinite geometric progression
|
\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} x^{n-1} = \frac{1}{1-x} \mbox{ for } | x | < 1.\]
|
(6) |
If \(x = 0,\) then \(\vert x\vert = \vert 0\vert < 1,\) which leads to
|
\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} 0^{n-1} = \frac{1}{1-0} = 1.\]
|
(7) |
The infinite sum can be expanded as 00 + 01 + 02 + … = 1. As stated by Vaughan, if 00 is not defined, this summation is senseless. Further, if 00 ≠ 1, then the summation is false.
Example 2. This example arises from the infinite summation for ex, which can be written as
|
\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^{n-1}}{(n-1)!} = e^x \mbox{, for all } x.\]
|
(8) |
Everyone agrees that 0! = 1, so in the case where x = 0, the sum becomes
|
\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{0^{n-1}}{(n-1)!} = e^0 = 1.\]
|
(9) |
The sum can be expanded as
|
\[\frac{0^0}{0!} + \frac{0^1}{1!} + \frac{0^2}{2!} + \cdots = \frac{0^0}{1} + 0 + 0 + \cdots = 0^0.\]
|
(10 |
The right-hand-side of the summation is e0 = 1, so 00 = 1.
Example 3. A third example given by Vaughan involves the cardinal number of a set of mappings. In set theory, exponentiation of a cardinal number is defined as follows:
ab is the cardinal number of the set of mappings of a set with b members into a set with a members.
For instance, 23 = 8 because there are eight ways to map the set { x, y, z } into the set { a, b }. In order to calculate 00, determine the number of mappings of the empty set into itself. There is precisely one such mapping, which is itself the set of the empty set. "So, as far as cardinal numbers are concerned," wrote Vaughan, "00 = 1."
When might a mathematician want 00 to be something that is not indeterminate? If, for example, we are discussing the function f(x, y) = xy, the origin is a discontinuity of the function. No matter what value may be assigned to 00, the function xy can never be continuous at x = y = 0. Why not? The limit of xy along the line x = 0 is 0, but the limit along the line y = 0 is 1, not 0. For consistency and usefulness, a "natural" choice would be to define 00 = 1.
Next page >> Conclusion and Bibliography
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |